Peter Memishian wrote: > > This fast-path has been removed in the final phases of development due > > to to its incompatibility with an upcoming project which is making > > major changes in the same area of the kernel. For the initial UV > > putback, data packets will flow through the Nemo framework as with any > > other Nemo driver. A simpler fastpath implementation is being > > developed, and will be part of a future case. > > Looks great, except maybe the last sentence could be expanded upon to say > "We are actively working with the other project on an alternate fastpath > implementation that meets everyone's needs, and its architecture will be > part of a future case."
I've made this change. Thanks, -Seb
