> > > So, in short, is the use of uid 0 with minimal privileges for a
> > > non-networked daemon a gating issue? Or could a change (if possible)
> > > from uid 0 to the dladm user be done as part of a future case?
> >
> > If that's what's needed, then that's what's needed ;-)
>
> Which "that" is being referred to here?
Let me try again: If running with uid == 0 (and no privs) is
what is needed to operate correctly, then running with uid == 0
(and no privs) is what is needed. My preference would be running
with uid == dladm (and no privs).
Gary..
