Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > Far far better, IMO, is to "fix" the main driver this case is for > (cassini), which architecturally could easily be converted to GLDv3 and > bundled into Nevada, and then spend effort to wrap up GLDv3 enough to > publish it for 3rd parties. >
Completely agree. Adding complexity to GLDv3 to work around a performance issue that exists for one driver seems completely backwards. Paul
