> > > But I agree that after vanity naming, it is not obvious of mapping > > > between the Ap_Id to the link vanity name. Maybe I should somehow add > > > an option to show-phys to show the device path of a physical device? > > > > That's possible -- or the Ap_Id, though machines that aren't DR-capable > > won't have that AFAIK. > > > Just to be clear, we can only report /devices path for "active" physical > links. Once the link is "Removed", it might not associate to any hardware.
Understood. -- meem
