Cathy Zhou wrote: > I have several questions: > > 1. Do I need to have the manpage changes ready for the PSARC commitment? > > 2. Do I need to update the 20q doc? Especially some interfaces listed in > 20q doc have been changed. (q13 in 20q). > > 3. While think it more, I am still not sure whether we should remove the > per-driver device policy. Although it proves to not be very useful, and > it is not consistent with the link administration model we are > proposing, that all configuration should not be tied to the hardware > name, but it is consistent with device_policy for other non-datalink > devices. >
One additional question: Do we need the contract between the SMF folks and us for the use of /var/svc/profile/upgrade worked out before commitment or is it acceptable to state that we know we need one and we will get one? thanks, Dan
