Dan Groves wrote:
> I think Darren's suggestion would be better than what I have. Granted,
> I haven't spent much time thinking about it yet. However, I don't know
> if we'd have enough time to switch over to it, given how far along we
> are with Clearview work, and that would mean more work for Renee if NWAM
> will try to stay consistent with the Clearview model. I'll CC
> clearview-discuss to see if anyone there has an opinion.
Not that I am suggesting to change anything... It seems
that Darren's suggestion is in line with other network
info retrieval API, such as socket ioctl to get interface
data (lifreq).
--
K. Poon.
kacheong.poon at sun.com
