>> Chapter 2 administering a single interface
>>
>> 1. the introduction section
>>
>> "however, use of the ifconfig command remains a valid method to 
>> configure links"
>>
>> What does this mean?
>>
> The intention is to affirm that the changes introduced by project 
> Clearview in general are backward compatible. I will rephrase to make it 
> clearer.
> 
Sure.


>> 4. Section "how to replace a network card while using l
>> ink names"
>>
>> 4a. Step 4,5,6 are not clear to me. Do you mean to use DR to remove 
>> and insert network card? How to perform step 5?
>>
> This task is also building on existing doc which has a section on 
> replacing a network card. It wasn't clear in that doc either whether DR 
> is being used here or not. See more comments on 6a.
> 
Then I guess we need to figure the intention of the original document. The 
current document is not very clear.

>> 6. Section "Using link names in other applications"
>>
>> 6a. "Dynamic Reconfiguration (DR) can only be performed on system that 
>> support this feature, and all of these systems are servers."
>>
>> This is not true. Some wireless card can support DR. We've verified on 
>> some laptops.
>>
> The information was provided to me by a writer who manages hardware 
> documentation. It's for this reason that I also maintained that separate 
> section about replacing network cards separately (Section 4) from this 
> section because I thought that DR is a different operation altogether. 
> My understanding about DR is that, if it is supported, one can make 
> hardware swaps without any downtime for the machine. So there are 
> laptops that can do this as well? I'll look into DR more and then revise 
> the doc.
> 
Yes. Actually Joanna even tried to test DR on laptops. As it is more 
available than DR capable servers.

>> 10. Section "Configuring VLANs"
>>
>> 10a. After the Clearview project, *all* interface types should support 
>> VLAN, except some of them might have the restriction described in 
>> section 6.1.4 of the UV design document.
>>
> Ok. The list is also from current S10 docs. I had sent out an inquiry to 
> the team previously about what to do with lists such as what supports 
> VLAN, or link aggregations, or IPMP. Based on responses to that inquiry, 
> it seems safe to remove such lists when clearview is integrated.
> 
Sure.

- Cathy

Reply via email to