Cathy, I'm not sure if you were talking about shared-stack zones, exclusive-stack zones or both. Different comments seemed to apply to the different cases, but I really wasn't clear.
For example: On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:42:29PM +0800, Cathy Zhou wrote: > On the current Nevada release, one can plumb interfaces in two > different zones with the same interface name ip.tun0 without a > problem. I can see how this would be true with an exclusive stack, but is it also true for shared-stack? In the next paragraph you say: > If we decide the link name should be per-zone, then it brings up a problem > that how we represent the zone-local link name in a global zone. Interfaces (as distinct from links) in an exclusive-stack zone shouldn't be visible in the global zone (I assert and hope). Links probably are visible. Perhaps I'm confused because you're talking about "links" as opposed to "interfaces", or perhaps I'm just confused. Could you clarify? dme.
