> > > dladm_delete_conf() /* delete_conf */ > > > dladm_destroy_conf() /* free_conf */ > > These two names can be easily confused.
I agree -- especially since the dladm UI generally has create/delete as opposites (as per my earlier mail), but here we're correctly using create/destroy as opposites. > Maybe dladm_delete_conf(), dladm_release_conf()? When I think of "release", I don't think of deallocating something. What about keeping destroy, but changing "delete" to "remove"? Anyway, it's Dan's call :-) -- meem
