Peter Memishian wrote: > > I understand the current implementation. But unfortunately that it > > might not work in the new implementation - as there are persistence > > request comes both from libdladm and the kernel, we will use a daemon > > to do the persistence processing but the daemon won't know about the > > boundary of each subcommand invocation. > > That seems like an implementation detail. For example, each request could > include the rootdir and libdladm requests would set the rootdir to the > value set by the given application. > Sure, if so, I'd like it to be documented though. Because currently, dladm_set_rootdir() is not called (and is not needed) if the subcommand intent to write the configuration in the normal rootdir, and in the future, it will not be the case.
Thanks - Cathy
