Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > 3. Another problem is that when both forms of autopush configuration > exist, > > > > if we apply both autopush settings, it might leads to incorrect > behavior. So > > > > that I'd like only apply the per-link autopush setting in that case. > Is this > > > > acceptable? > > > > > > That makes sense to me. > > > > > I found it is impossible to implement this for style-2 open. When > accessing > > a device using style-2 opening approach, it is impossible to know which > link > > is accessed in stropen(), so that it is impossible to prevent autopush the > > traditional autopush(1M) modules at that time. > > > > So you're concerned about the list of modules that will be pushed when > opening a legacy style-2 node (e.g., /dev/ce)? > Right. And if it might cause problem that the same list of modules are pushed both on lower stream and the upper stream.
I've sent another proposal. Please take a look of it. Thanks - Cathy
