> > My take: no. The whole notion of creating links on-demand has a lot of > > problems (as you've pointed out). If the administrator really wants to > > use VLAN hack names and link properties, they can just explicitly create > > a VLAN hack link then set its link properties. > > > But today one can do that without problem, and I have a case to prove the > weirdness of this problem:
Seems like an implementation artifact. Does anything depend on the functionality? Is it documented to work? -- meem
