Peter Memishian wrote: > > For the inaccurate naming currently in the Nevada gate, it makes sense > > to rename dls_vlan_t and dls_vlan_*() to dls_link_t and dls_link_*() > > etc .., either now, or part of Clearview changes. > > It's not quite that simple, since the Nevada gate already has e.g. both a > dls_vlan_hold() and dls_link_hold().
Right. What is a "link" today in dls is really dls's handle on the underlying mac, and what is a "vlan" today is really the data-link. It's all very confusing, but that was the point of my original mesage. :-) -Seb
