Hi Ellie,

Thank you for the response. I'm using ENUM rules on BIND and I don't have
it fully working yet, but it's resolving to the correct domain now.

OPTIONS sip:[email protected];user=phone SIP/2.0
From: 
<sip:[email protected]>;tag=gKgrZ1oLEpAy6AvtbdjYr.-dPR4PFRStTo:
<sip:[email protected];user=phone>

07-05-2014 19:54:45.636 Debug stateful_proxy.cpp:2246: Translating URI
07-05-2014 19:54:45.636 Debug dnsresolver.cpp:141: Sending DNS NAPTR query
for 1.0.0.4.4.4.4.5.5.5.1.iot1.com
07-05-2014 19:54:45.637 Debug enumservice.cpp:435: Got NAPTR record: 100
10 "E2U+SIP" "U" "!^.*$!sip:[email protected]!"
07-05-2014 19:54:45.637 Debug enumservice.cpp:70: Split regex into
match=^.*$, replace=sip:[email protected]
07-05-2014 19:54:45.637 Debug enumservice.cpp:375: Enum lookup completes:
sip:[email protected]
07-05-2014 19:54:45.637 Debug stateful_proxy.cpp:1808: Update request URI
to sip:[email protected]
07-05-2014 19:54:45.637 Info stateful_proxy.cpp:1594: Route request to
domain example.com


Thank you,
Alan




On 5/7/14 11:30 AM, "Eleanor Merry" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Alan, 
>
>You can use ENUM and SIP URIs in your case below.
>
>You will need an ENUM rule that rewrites the domain of numbers that
>belong to DomainB, e.g. a jsonized version would be:
>{
>    "number_blocks" : [
>        {
>           "name" : "Numbers in DomainB",
>           "prefix" : "15554444",
>           "regex" : "!(^.*$)!sip:\\1@DomainB!"
>        }
>}
>
>Sprout receives an INVITE to "sip:+15554444001@DomainA". It pulls out
>'+15554444001' from the SIP URI, does an ENUM lookup on the number to see
>if the domain should be rewritten, finds the ENUM rule and rewrites
>DomainA to DomainB.
>
>Ellie
>
> 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kwon, Alan [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: 07 May 2014 16:58
>To: Eleanor Merry; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Tel URI
>
>Hi Ellie,
>
>The use case that I'm trying to test is a multi-domain use case. Let's
>say user A (1-555-444-3001) belongs to DomainA and B (1-555-444-4001)
>belongs to Domain B. When user A tries to reach out to user B, in the
>Contacts, A only has B's telephone number. If I configure the devices to
>use SIP URI, INVITE will be sent to "sip:+15554444001@DomainA" and since
>B belongs to DomainB, it obviously won't reach B.
>
>That's the reason I'm configuring the devices to use Tel-URI. So that
>Tel:+15554444001 would be translated by ENUM to sip:+15554444001@DomainB.
>So, is this type of multi-domain use case not currently supported by
>Clearwater?
>
>Thanks,
>Alan
>
>
>
>On 5/7/14 10:42 AM, "Eleanor Merry" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Alan,
>>
>>We don't currently support Tel-URIs.
>>
>>While Clearwater does have function to support ENUM lookups for a TEL
>>URI (INVITEs only), this function isn't tested as part of our QA (and
>>so there may be issues with it). We're expecting to add support for TEL
>>URIs in the future - in the meantime are you able to use SIP URIs?
>>
>>Clearwater also supports ENUM lookups for numbers embedded in a SIP URI.
>> 
>>Ellie
>> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected]
>>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>Kwon, Alan
>>Sent: 06 May 2014 23:13
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: [Clearwater] Tel URI
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I know that in the WIKI
>>(https://github.com/Metaswitch/clearwater-docs/wiki/SIP-Interface-Speci
>>fic ations), it says Tel-URI is not supported, but I was under the
>>impression that you simply can't use the Tel-URI as your public URI,
>>but would be able to send a request out to a Tel-URI since there's a
>>support for ENUM server.
>>
>>I tried it today and I'm receiving 416.
>>
>>OPTIONS tel:+15554443001 SIP/2.0
>>From: 
>><sip:[email protected]>;tag=sYys9XoDHolpvwEf7Jv2o9dQdDSP-Nbo
>>To: <tel:+15554443001>
>>
>>SIP/2.0 416 Unsupported URI Scheme
>>From: 
>><sip:[email protected]>;tag=sYys9XoDHolpvwEf7Jv2o9dQdDSP-Nbo
>>To: <tel:+15554443001>;tag=z9hG4bKPjJqZHB7Oo3n7ITZ9BbVvlEpO5czHUA0y6
>>
>>So, Tel-URI is not supported at all? Then, what's the ENUM server used
>>for?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Alan
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Clearwater mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.projectclearwater.org/listinfo/clearwater
>

_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/listinfo/clearwater

Reply via email to