Hi, The stress tests shouldn't time out like that. Can you see if either of your Bono's receives the REGISTERs? If they don't then can you check that the stress node can resolve the Bono address (on a sip stress node, this will be either the home_domain, or (one of the) bono_servers set in /etc/clearwater/config), and that the Bono nodes will accept traffic from the stress nodes.
Thanks for the documentation pointer - I'll update this. Ellie -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Antonio Ken Iannillo Sent: 26 November 2014 18:43 To: [email protected] Subject: [Clearwater] Connection Timeout on Large Scale Deployment Hi all, I manually installed a larger scale deployment (2 copies of every service but ellis) and I run the stress sipp test. I got all timeouts, but I didn't get them with a simple deployment. Do you think it depends on a greater network delay or maybe i could have mis-configured something? In sipp error logs I got something like: '. > 2014-11-26 19:27:16:661 1417026436.661073: Aborting call on > unexpected message for Call-Id '[email protected]': while > expecting '401' (index 3), received 'SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout > Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.107:5060 > ;rport=24582;received=192.168.1.107;branch=z9hG4bK-9941-17-2-201000016 > 6- > Call-ID: 2010000166///[email protected] > From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=9941SIPpTag0017 > To: > <sip:[email protected]>;tag=z9hG4bK-9941-17-2-2010000166- > CSeq: 1 REGISTER > Content-Length: 0 > '. while in the sipp message log i have: Problem EAGAIN on socket 12 and poll_idx is 2 > Added first buffered message to socket 12 Problem EWOULDBLOCK on > socket 12 and poll_idx is 2 Exit problem event on socket 12 Wrote > 702 of 702 bytes in an output buffer. > ----------------------------------------------- 2014-11-26 > 19:27:11:27.944 TCP message received [363] bytes : > SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout > Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.107:5060 > ;rport=24578;received=192.168.1.107;branch=z9hG4bK-9941-23-2-201000015 > 4- > Call-ID: 2010000154///[email protected] > From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=9941SIPpTag0023 > To: > <sip:[email protected]>;tag=z9hG4bK-9941-23-2-2010000154- > CSeq: 1 REGISTER > Content-Length: 0 > > ----------------------------------------------- > Unexpected TCP message received: > SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout > Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.1.107:5060 > ;rport=24578;received=192.168.1.107;branch=z9hG4bK-9941-23-2-201000015 > 4- > Call-ID: 2010000154///[email protected] > From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=9941SIPpTag0023 > To: > <sip:[email protected]>;tag=z9hG4bK-9941-23-2-2010000154- > CSeq: 1 REGISTER > Content-Length: 0 I tried to increase send and receive timeout in the sipp command but the results didn't change. P.S.: Feedback on documentation --> in the description of large scale deployment, while clustering homestead one should unistall both homestead and homestead-prov in order to inject both schemas in cassandra. In the doc only homestead is specified. _______________________________________________ Clearwater mailing list [email protected] http://lists.projectclearwater.org/listinfo/clearwater _______________________________________________ Clearwater mailing list [email protected] http://lists.projectclearwater.org/listinfo/clearwater
