Hi Chris,

Thanks for the reply. Part of what you said is cerrect and Part of it is
not. The situation is:

- 6505550320 send an INVITE to 6505550399 (This was correct)
- 6505550320 receives back the invite, which was supposed to be sent to
6505550399
- 6505550320 cancel the call (no need to talk to himself on the phone)

Note: both 6505550320 and 6505550399 are on the same local network and
registered with the same public IP address (193.59.43.66)

- when bono receives an INVITE from [email protected] he must froward
it to [email protected] however for some reason 6505550320 receives
his own invite back.

My Main question should be how to I configure Clearwater to work on this
situation? (both users are rigistered with the same public IP because they
are in the same local network). My second question is could a NATing router
in the path be the reason behind this problem?

If you need any more logs or files from my Clearwater machines pleas inform
me, and thanks for helping.

(the IP addresses where changed in this log to protect costumer identity,
but I guess there where chnages in a way that makes since)

regards
Tariq


On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:00 PM, <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Send Clearwater mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Clearwater digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: SIP INVITE going to the wrong User Account
>       (Chris Elford (projectclearwater.org))
>    2. Native WiFi calling (Ignacio Verona)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 08:54:34 +0000
> From: "Chris Elford (projectclearwater.org)"
>         <[email protected]>
> To: Tariq Damra <[email protected]>,
>         "[email protected]"
>         <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Project Clearwater] SIP INVITE going to the wrong User
>         Account
> Message-ID:
>         <
> blupr0201mb184321ba9815a94723175f01e1...@blupr0201mb1843.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Tariq,
>
> I took a quick look through your logs and it looks like:
>
> ?         Subscriber 650555032 tries to call 6505550399
>
> ?         Bono sends an INVITE our to 6505550399.
>
> ?         Bono re-transmits that message as it receives no provisional
> response (e.g. 180 Ringing).
>
> ?         650555032 gives up and CANCELs the call.
>
> Bono receives its first INVITE from 193.59.43.66:5432 over UDP. It
> attempts to send the INVITE on to the other subscriber at
> 74.66.66.66:56157 over UDP.
>
> Does that sound right?
>
> Chris
>
> From: Clearwater [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Tariq Damra
> Sent: 25 May 2016 08:44
> To: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Subject: [Project Clearwater] SIP INVITE going to the wrong User Account
>
> Hi,
> I am using x-lite as my SIP client. The registration of my SIP user is
> done successfully without any problems, but when I send an SIP INVITE
> request to another registered user the invite is received by the same
> originating user who sent it. In other words the phone who initiated the
> call is the same phone that rings. My assumption (not nessesarly true) is
> that a NAT router located between me and my Cleanwater machine is causing
> the problem. here are the logs from bono. I apreciate the help.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/pipermail/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org/attachments/20160525/f87d7e6b/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 12:27:27 +0200
> From: Ignacio Verona <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Project Clearwater] Native WiFi calling
> Message-ID:
>         <
> camqppjkjb2mc4xebehm03cbxddz1p_lds_9-ge-cd9ncaeo...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi all,
>
> this is my first message to the list, so hello everyone! I work on the NFV/
> SDN area as a solution architect. My experience is mainly on the fixed
> services, so I'm familiar but not an expert on IMS and EPC technologies.
>
> My question is the following:
>
> After Apple introducing native Wifi Calling support on the latest iOS
> releases I was wondering if it might be possible to create a test
> environment using Clear Water. My main question is on the access side: For
> wifi calling, the UE discovers the ePDG by DNS, and uses it to setup an
> IPSec tunnel. So, a full EPC is required to test wifi calling? As far as I
> understand it is, because the PDG is the only node able to start the
> tunnel, both from the UE to itself and the GTP one to the PGW. If so, do
> you know of any suitable open source EPC implementation that could be used?
>
> Does anyone have any experiences on this?
>
> thanks a lot in advance,
> Ignacio.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/pipermail/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org/attachments/20160525/b5765ef3/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clearwater mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Clearwater Digest, Vol 37, Issue 39
> ******************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org

Reply via email to