Dear All,

We are trying to evaluate the performance of single sprout node against two 
sprout nodes in the Clearwater IMS for the SIP call load. (using multi VM based 
CW IMS image) This is to demonstrate the necessity and advantage of scaling out 
the sprout node.

So what we are attempting is to find out the overload point of single sprout 
when calls start failing, whereas for the similar load two sprout scenario 
works fine. We use SIPp to emulate calls. We normally generate from 50 
calls/sec and keep in increasing till 100/150 calls per second.

However when we are experimenting the above scenario (first to find the 
overload point for single sprout), we  are finding inconsistent observation. 
Some time single sprout creates call failures for even 50 calls/ sec, but if we 
experiment after sometime single sprout is able to tolerate even more than 100 
calls per seconds. Based on our study from CW website, we understand that this 
might be due to  dynamic throttling supported  by CW IMS nodes.  We have tried 
to manipulate the value of max tokens as well as the token rate to ensure there 
is no dynamic throttling, however couldn't find any visible improvement in the 
observation. Due to this we are unable to fix the overload point for single 
sprout hence couldn't able to do a testing for getting visible performance 
improvement comparison between single and two sprout nodes.

I have few queries here. Can you please help us in getting clarity here?


1)      Is there a possibility exist to disable dynamic throttling? If not, any 
parameter setting e.g. token related parameter will ensure throttling is not 
happening?

2)      Is there a predefined overload point in terms of number SIP calls/ sec 
for a single sprout? (we are suing single single core, 2 GB RAM, 20 GB hard 
disk VM for sprout)

3)      Is there any recommended parameters for this kind of testing -  in 
terms of SIP load ie calls/sec. any configuration parameter setting (like token 
as well as any other)?

4)      As per our understanding sprout is first component expected to be 
scaled out because it will be more loaded than any other CW IMS nodes. Is our 
understanding is correct?

5)      When we scale out sprout, scaling out sprout alone is enough or any 
other nodes also expected to be scaled out to see the performance improvement?

Thanks,
Jackson
_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org

Reply via email to