>From TS 124.229 V12.6.0, the spec doesn't say anything about the 200OK response from the request. It only talks about the subsequent request should be co-related with the previous request by using ODI in route header. To me it looks like a bug.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Anthony Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > In my case, there is a application service in terminating side doing > message Store-And-Forward. > So when the service receives an Invite it replies 200OK response > immiediately and then it create a new Invite to the user. > > Since scscf invalidated the AS chain when it receives 200OK response the > Invite request is matched with iFC again from the beginning instead just > match with the rest iFCs. So it fail to send to the user. > > Is it a bug? > > > Anthony >
_______________________________________________ Clearwater mailing list [email protected] http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
