Thanks, Mark, makes sense. I don't have anything with this IP address actually, but I get the idea. Does this mean, however, that I can not permanently fix the cacti templates, because this suffix will be different for another Clearwater deployment?
Another issue: I couldn't get any call stats via SNMP from the SIPp node. Does it offer anything via SNMP? And via 0MQ? I tried the "*cw_stat <https://github.com/Metaswitch/cpp-common/tree/master/scripts/stats>*" script, but no luck so far. Does SIPp even offer "call_stats" via 0MQ? (The page has no mention of call_stats.) The 0MQ port 6666 in the SIPp cacti template suggests it's a Sprout stats. But does it make sense? Not sure Sprout offers anything via 0MQ either. (Should I start a new thread on this?) On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 13:12, Mark Perryman <[email protected]> wrote: > Matvey, > > > That OID looks to be ending with an IP address. > > > > e.g. > > sproutConnectedHomesteadsEntry OBJECT-TYPE > > SYNTAX SproutConnectedHomesteadsEntry > > MAX-ACCESS not-accessible > > STATUS current > > DESCRIPTION "Statistics for a single connected upstream Homestead" > > INDEX { sproutHomesteadInetAddrType, > > sproutHomesteadInetAddr } > > ::= { sproutConnectedHomesteadsTable 1 } > > > > The .4 is the Address type (IPv4), and then the next four octets make up > the address. > > > > *From:* Clearwater <[email protected]> *On > Behalf Of *matvey bossis > *Sent:* 25 March 2019 12:33 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Project Clearwater] correct OID for Cacti > > > > NOTE: Message is from an external sender > > So maybe someone has an up-to-date monitoring setup and willing to share? > > > > BTW, looks like "Chronos" metrics were removed from Sprout. Perhaps > completely renamed? Or irrelevant? > > > > Didn't figure out yet, what is the best way to graph the additional Sprout > metrics, not present in the template. So maybe someone has a setup, or > screenshots... > > > > What about SNMP for SIPp? The Cacti template uses zero-mq, and nothing > interesting in SNMP there. Should it work? Or zero-mq only? > > > > Mark, maybe you know: some of the OIDs, which were changed in the above > commit, seem to need an additional ".4.110.111.100.101" suffix. Does it > have something to do with the commit? Or where could it come from? (For > example: .1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3.2*.4.110.111.100.101*. Those > which didn't change, don't need this suffix.) > > > > Thanks > > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 17:10, Mark Perryman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yes. > > > > It looks like the OIDs were changed here: > https://github.com/Metaswitch/clearwater-snmp-handlers/pull/168/files > > > > Hope that helps, > > > > Mark. > > > > *From:* Clearwater <[email protected]> *On > Behalf Of *matvey bossis > *Sent:* 19 March 2019 15:04 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Project Clearwater] correct OID for Cacti > > > > NOTE: Message is from an external sender > > Thanks, > > so for example: > > > *snmpwalk -v2c -c clearwater 192.168.37.17:25565 > <http://192.168.37.17:25565> 1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1**.3* > > produces: > > PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopePrevious5SecondPeriod."node" > = Gauge32: 148 > PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopeCurrent5MinutePeriod."node" > = Gauge32: 161 > PROJECT-CLEARWATER-MIB::sproutLatencyAverage.scopePrevious5MinutePeriod."node" > = Gauge32: 139 > > Am I right to infer, that the *.3* in the end, replaces the deprecated > *.2* (or .2.1) in the end ? > > (And that the .2 was a single metric, while the new one comes in 3 > aggregations?) > > > > The above seems to be translated from: > > *.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3*.1.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 148 > *.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3*.2.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 161 > *.1.2.826.0.1.1578918.9.3.1.1.3*.3.4.110.111.100.101 = Gauge32: 139 > > > > So the logic to change the OIDs of the metrics must have been, that they > are not 100% backwards compatible? > > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 15:13, Mark Perryman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks, yes it appears the Cacti templates haven’t been kept up to date. > > > > Instructions for using the correct MIB is at: > https://clearwater.readthedocs.io/en/stable/Clearwater_SNMP_Statistics.html > > > > If you do create an up to date cacti template, please submit a Pull > Request with it (you would need to sign our contributors agreement). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mark Perryman. > > > > > > *From:* Clearwater <[email protected]> *On > Behalf Of *matvey bossis > *Sent:* 18 March 2019 13:00 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Project Clearwater] correct OID for Cacti > > > > NOTE: Message is from an external sender > > My OIDs seem to be different from the ones in the Cacti templates, for > Bono, Sprout etc. Am I doing something wrong? > > > > Does anyone have the correct templates? Maybe a screenshot of your Cacti > graphs, please? > > > > Thank you > > _______________________________________________ > Clearwater mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org > > _______________________________________________ > Clearwater mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org > > _______________________________________________ > Clearwater mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org >
_______________________________________________ Clearwater mailing list [email protected] http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
