Hi Karl,

any ETA for the new security provider and framework release? would be great
if we could get rid of the clerezza branch of felix security and use a
current felix version.

Cheers,
reto

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Karl Pauls <[email protected]> wrote:

> You need to update the security provider. There is a new snapshot i
> think but otherwise build it yourself. We now have support for 4.2 and
> some internal api has changed (thats why you see the error). I'm going
> to cut a 1.0.0 release of the security provider any day now (along
> with a new version of the framework - which will be based on the
> current trunk).
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tsuyoshi Ito <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > Try to update clerezza.platform.launcher.storageless to use felix
> 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.4.1 because of felix framework.security (see
> FELIX-1101: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1101).
> >
> > When starting launcher.sesame on
> >
> > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p3
> >
> > java version "1.6.0_07"
> > Diablo Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_07-b02)
> > Diablo Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 10.0-b23, mixed mode)
> >
> > the following error occured:
> >
> > The activate method has thrown an exception
> > java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
> org.apache.felix.framework.SecurityProviderImpl.getSignerMatcher(Lorg/osgi/framework/Bundle;I)Ljava/lang/Object;
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.getSignerMatcher(Felix.java:3510)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.BundleImpl.getSignerCertificates(BundleImpl.java:847)
> >        at
> org.osgi.framework.SignerProperty.isBundleSigned(SignerProperty.java:109)
> >        at
> org.osgi.framework.AdminPermission$1.run(AdminPermission.java:863)
> >        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> >        at
> org.osgi.framework.AdminPermission.getProperties(AdminPermission.java:854)
> >        at
> org.osgi.framework.AdminPermission.implies0(AdminPermission.java:656)
> >        at
> org.osgi.framework.AdminPermissionCollection.implies(AdminPermission.java:993)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.security.util.Permissions.implies(Permissions.java:394)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.security.permissionadmin.PermissionAdminImpl.check(PermissionAdminImpl.java:175)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.security.permissionadmin.PermissionAdminImpl.hasPermission(PermissionAdminImpl.java:157)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.SecurityProviderImpl.hasBundlePermission(SecurityProviderImpl.java:119)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.impliesBundlePermission(Felix.java:3519)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.BundleProtectionDomain.implies(BundleProtectionDomain.java:67)
> >        at
> java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:301)
> >        at
> java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:546)
> >        at
> java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:532)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.framework.BundleImpl.getLocation(BundleImpl.java:539)
> >        at
> org.apache.clerezza.platform.security.PermissionManager.activate(PermissionManager.java:125)
> >        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >        at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> >        at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> >        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.helper.BaseMethod.invokeMethod(BaseMethod.java:213)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.helper.BaseMethod.access$500(BaseMethod.java:38)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.helper.BaseMethod$Resolved.invoke(BaseMethod.java:542)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.helper.BaseMethod.invoke(BaseMethod.java:434)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.helper.ActivateMethod.invoke(ActivateMethod.java:138)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.manager.ImmediateComponentManager.createImplementationObject(ImmediateComponentManager.java:226)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.manager.ImmediateComponentManager.createComponent(ImmediateComponentManager.java:118)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.manager.AbstractComponentManager$Unsatisfied.activate(AbstractComponentManager.java:991)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.manager.AbstractComponentManager.activateInternal(AbstractComponentManager.java:298)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.manager.AbstractComponentManager$3.doRun(AbstractComponentManager.java:505)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.ComponentActivatorTask.run(ComponentActivatorTask.java:67)
> >        at
> org.apache.felix.scr.impl.ComponentActorThread.run(ComponentActorThread.java:96)
> >        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> > [SCR Component Actor] ERROR org.apache.clerezza.platform.security -
> [org.apache.clerezza.platform.security.PermissionManager] Component instance
> could not be created, activation failed
> >
> > I am not sure if I did something wrong because
> >
> > hasan tested it successfully on his linux machine (unbuntu, don't know
> which version of the VM) and Ulf Dittmer wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Ulf Dittmer commented on FELIX-1101:
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> If by "the issue you did see" you mean the "RuntimePermission for
> getClassLoader", then that's still happening. What's no longer happening is
> the "getSignerMatcher" issue I mentioned above. I'll create a new issue
> about the install/uninstall/reinstall behavior I mentioned in my second
> post.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Cheers
> > TSuy
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> [email protected]
>

Reply via email to