[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12881187#action_12881187
]
Reto Bachmann-Gmür commented on CLEREZZA-236:
---------------------------------------------
Hi Davide
Thanks for the patch, I'm sure Tommaso is more competent to say something to
the actual ontology design, I can just comment on formalities:
- location: Formely the ontology project was the only location for ontologies,
now with the nested maven project structure the idea is to keep only really
global ontologies (well known ontologies) while other ontologies are rather
kept in modules of the project using it.
- I'd suggest using skos:definition instead of rdfs:comments
- namespace http://clerezza.apache.org/scheme/entities/0.1/ : I'd suggest
http://clerezza.apache.org/2010/22/uima-entities -> we could discuss a policy
on mailing list
- names: for example in http://clerezza.apache.org/scheme/entities/0.1/Feature
we have an http-uri naming a non-information resource. to be compliant with the
http-14 resolution [1] the server would have to send a 303 redirecting to an
information resource, so I suggest using # instead of / to separate namespace
from term.
Cheers,
reto
1. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/2007-05-31/HttpRange-14.html
> Add RDF Schema Ontology for UIMA Entities/Annotations and features
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLEREZZA-236
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-236
> Project: Clerezza
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tommaso Teofili
> Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
> Attachments: CLEREZZA-236.patch
>
>
> Entities and annotations (with features) graphs should be added to the graph
> enriched by Apache UIMA
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
