On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Tommaso Teofili
<[email protected]>wrote:

> 2010/9/27 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <[email protected]>
>
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > Going through the issue with clerezza-site I noticed that the first
> > problem
> > > is on ScalaDoc generation inside SCB Scala Utils module and so I
> wondered
> > > which Scala version it is using.
> > > I took a look at the parent POM, where a scala.version property is
> > defined
> > > and I saw there is 2.8.0.RC5 , I think that it would be better to
> change
> > it
> > > to 2.8.0 (final version).
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > we should bring everything to the final scala 2.8.0, the main bundles are
> > not below the "parent for all" but in the scala-scripting sibling
> project.
> > The bundleization of scala compile and libraries might no longer be
> needed
> > as the servicemix version could be used instead:
> >
> >
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.scala-compiler/2.8.0_1/
> >
> > As different Scala versions are not binary compatible it is important not
> > to
> > have multiple versions in different modules (remembering some weird
> > errors).
> >
>
> We should probably go through each Scala module and check versions,

it should just be in org.apache.clerezza.parent and scala-scripting.


> I don't
> know servicemix, what would you do with it ?
>
I think it is just the same as our scala-bundleization projects
scala-compiler-osgi and scala-library-osgi.

Ciao,
Reto


>
> >
> > By the way, the issue with Scala Utils was due to an old version of
> > > maven-scala-plugin and it's now fixed; however latest clerezza-site
> > failed
> > > inside Platform Dashboard Tests module, now inspecting that one.
> > >
> > I think this plugin should have its version defined in the
> > plugin-management
> > section of the parent section, so that individual projects need not (and
> > shall not) specify the version.
> >
> >
> +1 I agree with that.
> Tommaso
>

Reply via email to