oh, sry I have no idea, how to generate such a project structure with a skeletin ________________________________________ Von: Oliver Strässer Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2011 12:40 An: [email protected] Betreff: AW: Skeleton projects and maven archetypes or from command-line
yes -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Reto Bachmann-Gmuer Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2011 10:08 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Skeleton projects and maven archetypes or from command-line On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Oliver Strässer < [email protected]> wrote: > goog idea reto > > don't forget a ontology project. > I think, all skeleton needs to be available as maven prototyype as well. > so that we could create all clerezza necessary projects structures in > netbeans or an alternative DIE, too. > > is the following projectstructure possible?: > > main project (group) > module core > src > pom.xml > ... > > module ontology > pom.xml > .... > pom.xml > > This looks identical to the existing project in archetypes, do you know how to make an actual maven prototype out of it? Cheers, Reto > > cheers > oli > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Reto > Bachmann-Gmuer > Gesendet: Samstag, 12. März 2011 11:45 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Skeleton projects and maven archetypes or from command-line > > Hello > > I'm writing some code to be able to create skeleton projects from the > clerezza console, this is specially usefull in combination with > sourcebundles as the newly created project is installed as source-bundle > and > you can start playing seeing the effect of your source-code changes right > away. > > I'm not sure if I should support multiple project types like this and/or if > some of these should also be available as maven prototype. > I'm thinking to support the following project types > - scala with activator > - scala with declarative services > - java with ssp > > the last project is what we currently have as skeleton project, as it uses > java it doesn't yet work with source-bundles. So I'm not sure if its better > to keep this make this a maven archetype (as planned, but I think some > magic > is still needed for it to be an archetype) or if it should be created via a > command-line command (I think it might be hard to support both ways without > code duplication). > > Cheers, > Reto >
