On 11 May 2011 17:23, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think that depends on the recent introduction of the scala slf4j module > which is assumed to replace the "common" slf4j artifacts, however I think we > should consider what Olivier is suggesting, will try to have a deeper look. > Tommaso
I have attached a fix for the pom in this jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-518 I confirm that this fixes the regression we observed on the integration tests of Stanbol. -- Olivier
