On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Henry Story <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 8 Jun 2011, at 13:02, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: > > > Dear Henry, > > > > The current situation is really annoying and part of the blame goes on me > as I'm part of the Clerezza community that failed to introduce you to the > project and the community in a way that empowers you to identify issues > suitable for an iterative development that leads to the envisaged viral > social web platform and to provide resolutions for these issues capable of > consensus. > > > > The current is the worst crises of our community and the biggest > impediment to productive work we have had till now. So I urge to collaborate > with the following approach to get back to productive work (i.e. getting > issues closed rather than arguing): > > > > - you withdraw your -1 against a patch that doesn't change the behaviour > of any existing method and which has had 5 +1 > > > > - I will give hand to find ways to identify useful issues and solutions > for the desired functionality. You specify the issue you'd like to address > and I'll help you split this up into actually resolvable (and reviewable) > issues and describe approaches on how this be resolved. Then you'll be able > to contribute to a monotonic growth of closed (tiny) issues and thus to a > constant improvement of clerezza. > > > > Please Henry, help leaving the current mess behind and get back to a > collaboration that yields to product improvements. > > Ok, sounds good. +1 > Great, thanks! I close the issue and I'll be looking at your code on CLEREZZA-416 to make proposals on bits that can be closed and trying to contribute patches. Sorry for the discussion getting over heated a bit. I'd like to add my apologies for an unfriendly tone in some of my mails. Enjoy Berlin! Reto >
