when the bundle was created, there was no intention to offer gui over the web. over the time people added stuff which now generates a naming problem. In future we should be careful in choosing name or in placing stuff into a bundle. Before releasing zz, changing bundles' name is tolerable to certain extents. In this case, I agree to change the name, but I would suggest something like
platform.tcaccess.web or platform.graphaccess.web It indicates a platform service providing access to (and management of) triple collections (graphs) over the web (jax rs) Although tcaccess is more precise than graphaccess, the term tc is not clear to most zz-newbies. I am ok with both, but tend to choose graphaccess (as we also use for graphnodeprovider, graphprovider) cheers hasan On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm looking at the rdf.web bundle. I though it would be nice to make the > backup-functionality available from the menus. > > The problem is that the menu functionality is platform specific so it > shouldn't be in an rdf.*-bundle. This is possibly the reason why the > sparql-endpoint isn't available via menus. The graph-management page > however > is menu-accessible, and a few ssp violate the principle of having no > rdf->platform dependencies as well. > > Shall I rename the artifact to platform.rdf.web or are there other > suggestions? > > Cheers, > Reto > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > agree, for sure it is better if we can keep information whether a > > serialized > > graph was coming from an mgraph or a graph. > > and this can be an improvement issue to be solved later after the > release. > > if one has time to do it before the release I wouldn't stop him from > doing > > it ;) > > > > cheers > > hasan > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > In the triplecollections.nt file in a backup-zip all triple collections > > are > > > described to be of type <http://clerezza.org/2009/11/backup#Graph>. > > > Shouldn't different types be used for graphs and mgraphs? I don't see > how > > > restoring an instance is possible from such a backup zip without > knowing > > > when to create a graph and whn to create an mgraph. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Reto > > > > > >
