2011/7/14 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > Hi Tommaso > > On one hand I was thinking that waiting 72h extra is not a big deal, > on the other hand that we should have a process that allows to release > individual modules independently. The fact that every module has its > own version number support this. > > I saw that you've withdrawn the release vote, what do you suggest now? > I think it shouldn't be difficult to release the uima modules a week > or so after the rest. The uima module poms should just inherit from > the released clerezza parent pom till they are relased to. >
Right Reto, I think we can go on with Clerezza release and then we can release the clerezza.uima module separately :) Tommaso > > Cheers, > Reto > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> > wrote: > > A vote for UIMA Addons release is on the run [1], so it'd be nice if we > > could wait until it gets closed (hopefully with a bunch of +1s). > > What do you think? > > Tommaso > > > > [1] : http://markmail.org/thread/gosusirktjy6ak3c > > > > 2011/7/12 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > > > >> Hi Tommaso > >> > >> I see that we have some snapshot dependencies left: > >> > >> org.apache.uima:AlchemyAPIAnnotator-osgi:jar:2.3.1-SNAPSHOT:compile > >> org.apache.uima:OpenCalaisAnnotator-osgi:jar:2.3.1-SNAPSHOT:compile > >> > >> Can we change these or do we have to exclude some modules from the > release? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Reto > >> > > >
