Tommaso Teofili said the following on 07/20/2011 04:57 PM: > 2011/7/20 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > >> On Jul 20, 2011 3:54 PM, "Tommaso Teofili" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I could run 'mvn install' successfully both from svn tag and from the >>> unzipped package >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201107/clerezza-201107.tar.gz >> . >>> However I see some issues which in my opinion should be solved for this >>> release: >>> - the .svn dir/files shouldn't be there >> I agree >>> - I think it'd be better to create two separate packages (in order to >>> distribute them from our website): a source-release package and a >>> binary-release package. >> This would be an archive consisting of all the binary jars, or should we >> exclude the jars for the bundles in the launcher? >> > I think we should also include the launchers as people would use them to > launch Clerezza. Yes, the launcher is a binary jar, certainly the most important one. I was suggesting to exclude the bundles contained in the launcher. Also there is no use for the storageless launcher which is only used in the process of building a launcher with storage (it could confuse people that try to launch it and find that most services don't work).
So the release zip would consist of: - tdb launcher - bundles not in launcher (like stable serializer) - clerezza maven plugins Cheers, Reto >>> - I see the uima module in the source directory of the package while it >>> shouldn't be there as it doesn't get released in this version >> It is part of the tag as the release-plugin includes all children of >> parent. >> > If the uima module is commented in the parent I thought the release-plugin > would've excluded it. > > >>> - the NOTICE/LICENSE files should be at the top level inside the release >>> package >> I agree. I added them to every place where a pom is but apparently forgot >> the parent. >> >>> Hence my -1. >> Actually the only reason i didn't tally the vote yet, is because I needed >> the authoritative list of committers. Hope the vote can pass quickly once >> the things are fixed. I can do this tomorrow morning, but as I'll be away >> next week could you be the release manager for the next voting round? So >> hopefully it is released after my holliday :) >> > I have also the longish UIMA Addons release to follow but I'll do my best to > look after this one too. > Should I need an helping end I'll ask here to handover to someone else :) > Thanks, > Tommaso > > > > >> Cheers, >> Reto >> >>> Tommaso >>> >>> 2011/7/19 Hasan Hasan <[email protected]> >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> working fine on my ubuntu 10.10 >>>> >>>> cheers >>>> hasan >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> I suggest we release clerezza parent and all the modules in the >> release >>>>> profile except uima (which can hopefully be release soon after). >>>>> >>>>> The tarball and its signature are available here: >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201107/ >>>>> >>>>> In svn the release version is tagged clerrezza-201107 >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Yes, please release >>>>> [ ] +0 No time to review >>>>> [ ] -1 Something wrong >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Reto >>>>>
