On 10 Aug 2011, at 15:47, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > Hi > > James has agreed to release license mozile under the ASL. > > As you can read in his mail some icons are licensed under the Creative > Commons Attribution 2.5 license. In > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html I don't see the CC licenses > listed. > > Doe anyone know if these icons can be included?
They are listed here http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html This is the resource that the 3party points to as the official version. CC seems to be accepted there. > > Cheers, > Reto > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: James A. Overton <ja...@overton.ca> > Date: Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:28 PM > Subject: Re: Mozile > To: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@gmuer.ch> > > > Hi Reto, > > I'm ready to make the licensing changes, but I want to check the > details with you first. I presume that it's Mozile 0.8 that you want > to use -- if not, let me know. Mozile 0.8 is currently distributed > under any one of three licenses > (http://mozile.mozdev.org/0.8/LICENSE). My thought was to simply add > Apache 2.0 as a fourth available license. Since I wrote all of the > Mozile 0.8 code myself, I can make that change. > > However there are some icons included in the Mozile 0.8 distribution > from the Silk icon set, which are licensed under Creative Commons > Attribution 2.5 license > (http://mozile.mozdev.org/0.8/images/silk/COPYING). Is that acceptable > for your purposes? If not, you'll have to replace them with something > else, I guess. > > I don't know anything about this hallo-editor, but Mozile does not > work the same as contentEditable editors. ContentEditable started in > old versions of IE and presents some basic editing commands to produce > HTML 3 era markup. Mozile uses standard DOM commands. (Sometimes > Mozile uses contentEditable just to get an editing cursor.) In theory, > Mozile should be more powerful and flexible. In practice, the Mozile > code always had bugs, and by now it's pretty old. > > James > > > > On 2011-07-15, at 14:31 , Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > >> Hi James >> >> That's good news! >> >> I noticed the problem right before the planed release, so for this very >> first release (currently being voted upon) i just removed mozile >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-608). I opened a new issue >> (CLEREZZA-609) to re-allow inline editing. >> >> Another editor I wanted to look at is henry bergius hallo-editor. A >> minimalistic conetntEditable based editor. Do you happen to know how the >> different approaches compare? >> >> Hope you're enjoying your travelling. >> >> Cheers, >> Reto >> On Jul 15, 2011 3:19 PM, "James A. Overton" <ja...@overton.ca> wrote: Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
