Hi Reto I have fixed it: I have removed the xml header from the seedsnipe template. I hope this is ok. When I have time, I will change the templates from seedsnipe to ssp.
Cheers Tsuy On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > Hi Tsuy > > I exchanged the wrong copyright headers but the problem seems to > persist. If you happen to have some time looking at it that wuld be > great. > > Cheers, > reto > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi Tsuy >> >> Happy new year to you too! >> >> Yes indeed this xml header and the xml style license header are the >> wrong thing in an ssp. >> >> This is a major bug but I personally think we could release >> nevertheless, as the important thing now is to have a first release >> and to get used to the process. In future a release should of course >> not break existing features. >> >> Cheers, >> Reto >> >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Tsuyoshi Ito <tsuy....@trialox.org> wrote: >>> Hi Reto >>> >>> First of all, I wish you a happy New Year. >>> >>> I am testing the release you made (btw thanks for the release). I try to >>> render the ssp from the scriptmanager. Unfortunately, an error occurred >>> because of the tag <?xml version='1.0'?> which was added in ZZ-652. >>> >>> How should we proceed? Should we release without fixing it. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Tsuy >>> --trialox ag------------------------------------- tsuyoshi ito hardturmstrasse 101 8005 zuerich
