Hi Tsuy For a code change veto to be qualified you must specify a technical reason. That you don't feel like replacing SKOS with SKOS08 in your code written against trunk doesn't seem like a technical reason. Otherwise any API change could be vetoed with that argument.
So I think we should do an explicit vote on that code change, for that I moved the changes to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/clerezza/issues/CLEREZZA-717/ Cheers, Reto On Sep 6, 2012 9:01 AM, "Tsuy Ito" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Reto > > We are using http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#. > > -1 > > please revert the changes. > > cheers > tsuy > > On Sep 5, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> AFAIK > >> > >>> http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos# > >> > >> was used during the draft face of the new version, but than it was > >> decided to keep using > >> > >>> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core# > >> > >> in the final recommendation. > >> > >> Thanks Rupert. > > > >> so +1 for the change > >> > > > > Done. > > > > Reto > > --trialox ag------------------------------------- > tsuyoshi ito > hardturmstrasse 101 > 8005 zuerich > >
