--- Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm beginning to think that something is amiss with
> the temporary bash
> build in CLFS. I looked at the bash source in
> bash-3.1/subst.c, and
> there are fallbacks for #!defined HAVE_DEV_FD. In
> other words, the
> process substitution <(list) should work no matter
> what.
> 
> Checking my temp bash in /tools/bin again, the build
> log says
> 
> [11:50 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] grep /dev/fd
> /mnt/lfs/jhalfs/logs/039-bash
> checking whether /dev/fd is available... absent
> 
> [11:51 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] /tools/bin/bash -c "echo <(ls)"
> /tmp/sh-np-1154390516
> 
> So, the process substitution works despite failing
> that feature test.
> I think that's why we don't see the c++-types
> failure in LFS or DIY.
> 
> Did you ever try the workaround `./configure ...
> bash_cv_dev_fd=standard'?

Not yet. I think that Ken was trying that.
If there's nothing posted until this evening (it's
morning, here), I'll try that and report you. Sorry
for the delay, but I've not a lot of time in front of
my LFS machine.

G. Moko


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev

Reply via email to