On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:13:31PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > Seems like it shouldn't fail as long as config.h has #undef > HAVE_PPC_SECURE_PLT. You say that this is commented in config.h? I'm > confused. Anyway, here's the relevant patch from earlier this year. > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2006-03/msg00016.html > > If you're really curious, maybe you could put a couple extra printf's > in there to see what's going on. > In fact, after I'd shut the machine down to go to bed, it became blindingly obvious to me to do that :) And guess what, __powerpc64__ was defined in the 32-bit compile. This morning, I've taken a look at the logs and realised that for this test it uses 'gcc' instead of 'gcc -m32' !!! I bet it works on fedora because they default to the 32-bit version of gcc.
I'll take a look at the Makefiles later. Thanks for the reference. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce _______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
