Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 03:29:45PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
>
>> The development team has been talking, and a few people have expressed
>> some concerns with the boot build method. A lot of people think it
>> should be a fully functional system, with the ability to use the
>> network. Which everyone agree's needs to happen, but everyone has a
>> different idea. This is to propose the idea I think will benefit
>> everyone, will only 1 package added to the build.
>>
>>
> Well, since you've opened this can of worms ...
>
> A system without a working editor isn't fully functional. Yes, I
> know real men can write just about anything in bash, and heroes can
> probably write a functional editor with a simple here document, but
> adding vim to the boot build for 1.1 would be nice - it
> cross-compiles OK with Joe's 2.0 patch, although in my experience it
> only works like vi (so, it might need an /etc/vimrc or similar).
>
I have a habbit of installing vim into /tools (with a /tools/etc/vimrc)
> Oh, and _fully_ functional usually means a bit of cblfs (ssh or
> nfs, for example). Where should we draw the line ?
>
I think nfs-utils is a bit much, openssl (for openssh) is it's own
bucket of worms but dropbear is an option. Jeremy has his ssh hint.
Trac's wiki sounds good to me for stuff like that.
_______________________________________________
Clfs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
