Okay, I started adding descriptions to various of the CBLFS packages since many of them lack them. However, before I did much more, I thought that I would make sure that the rest of you didn't mind my formatting changes.
I've been putting the "Introduction to <PACKAGE_NAME>" section at the beginning of the section (above the dependencies). It contains the package description. That's the way BLFS does it. It makes it quick and easy to see what the package is. Thus far I haven't seen any packages formatted in that manner in CBLFS, so while I definitely prefer it that way, I'd like to verify that that's fine with the rest of you folks before I change most of them over. At the moment, the few packages that have the "Contents" section at the bottom have the description at the top of that section. Personally, I think that if the description is at the top, the one on the bottom is unnecessary. BLFS has the contents in the same manner but does not duplicate the description. Assuming that we put the package description at the top, does anyone want it duplicated in the "Contents" section? - Jonathan Davis P.S. Thanks for all the hard work that everyone has put into CBLFS thus far.
_______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
