Jonathan Davis wrote: > > > As long as it works, I don't think that I really care which approach > we use, but I thought that CLFS 2.0 (now CLFS sysroot) was supposed to > be using the sysroot approach. If CLFS 1.x starts using it, what will > be the difference between the two? Or will CLFS sysroot disappear > once CLFS 1.x has switched to that approach? clfs-2.0 (renamed clfs-sysroot) uses sysroot to compile the final system, skipping /tools entirely. In clfs-1.0 sysroot is being used to compile /tools. You still have to chroot/boot into /tools to build the final system. Buildin the toolchain this way there's no need to symlink $CLFS/tools and $CLFS/cross-tools to /. There are no directories/references outside of $CLFS now.
_______________________________________________ Clfs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-dev
