> Peter Buelow schreef:
>> I'd like to bulid the cross compiler in a more standard directory, and
>> then use a program-prefix for gcc and binutils. Then I can name my x86
>> build something a little shorter, like x86-uclibc-command instead of the
>> i686-pc-linux-gnu-command that is spit out now. The alt dir is easy
>> enough, but the name is killing me. I know about --program-prefix, but
>> gcc
>> spits on this nearing the end saying it can't find
>> i686-pc-linux-uclibc-ar, which I would expect. Not sure how I fix this.
>> Any thoughts? For now, I live with the longer names.
>>
>> -Pete
> You can't just change names just because you want to, the target triplet
> actually has meaning: what architecture you're using, what it's built
> for, etc, i686-unknown- will produce binaries different from
> i686-pc-linux-uclibc.
>
> If you want to save yourself some typework, add something to
> $HOME/.bash_profile like this (assuming CLFS_TARGET is set):
> export ccp="${CLFS_TARGET}"
>
> then use ${ccp}-gcc, ${ccp}-ld etc etc
> _______________________________________________
> Clfs-support mailing list
> Clfs-support@lists.cross-lfs.org
> http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support
>
Yeah, but I also know you can, because MontaVista does this for their
platforms. I figured it wasn't easy though. Anyway, like I said, it works
as is, but I liked being able to name these such that it saved some
tedious typing._______________________________________________ Clfs-support mailing list Clfs-support@lists.cross-lfs.org http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support
