Tobias Vogel wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for that patch,
> i compiled it, but it seems not to work properly, instead of i486
> uname now shows x46_64, so neither x86_64 nor i486.
> is there any other kernel-hack method?
>
> thanks,
>
> toby
>
> Joe Ciccone wrote:
>   
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:31:36PM +0200, Tobias Vogel wrote:
>>>   
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> the configure-output seems quite normal to me:
>>>>
>>>> root:/sources/glibc-build# ../glibc-2.4/configure --prefix=/usr 
>>>> --disable-profile --enable-add-ons --enable-kernel=2.6.0 
>>>> --libexecdir=/usr/lib/glibc             
>>>> checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>> checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>  Those last 2 lines are only normal if you are building for x86_64.
>>> And yes, in chroot on x86_64 the system will respond to 'uname -m'
>>> with x86_64 if the kernel is 64-bit.
>>>
>>>  Basically, if you are following the 1.0.0 x86 book on x86_64, you
>>> should use the 'if you are going to boot' option and build a 32-bit
>>> kernel, copy it over, and then build chapters 9 and 10 on the target
>>> board.
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> Or, load a uname hack into the kernel right before you chroot so uname 
>> -m reports i486 on the target system.
>>
>> http://www.cross-lfs.org/~jciccone/uname_ix86.c for 2.6.16 (I think) and 
>> newer kernels or http://www.cross-lfs.org/~jciccone/uname_hack.tar.bz2 
>> for older 2.6 kernels.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clfs-support mailing list
>> Clfs-support@lists.cross-lfs.org
>> http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clfs-support mailing list
> Clfs-support@lists.cross-lfs.org
> http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support
>
>   
Sorry about that,

Add #include <linux/string.h> to the includes up at the top and change
utsname()->machine[1] = UNAME_DUMB_STEPPING;
 -to-
memcpy(utsname()->machine, "i486", 4);

The hack was originally designed for i?86. as i'm sure you can tell by 
the change it made.
_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
Clfs-support@lists.cross-lfs.org
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support

Reply via email to