Jaap Struyk wrote:
> Sunil Amitkumar Janki schreef:
>
>   
>> Why don't you try to get CLFS running without hlfs patches first?
>>     
>
> That suxseeded fine on AMD64, nothing funny happend.
>
>   
>> I have recently completed a pure CLFS SPARC64 build and
>> will try to get security patches integrated when I gradually
>> rebuild software on the host. For me at least it's much easier
>> to tackle one problem at a time.
>>     
>
> Main problem I ran into is the basic toolchain, binutils,gcc and glibc
> (what else) only the issue with that is that it doesn't seem possible to
> tackle them one for one since they need ssp from each other.
> Building the static toolchain goes fine and the hlfs test for checking
> ssp works (bether than expected since 64bit does need a lot more input
> before it smashes then 32bit) but the missery starts in chapter 6.
> I'll try again next week, maybe something pops up that pushes me in the
> right direction...
>   
I've attempted this type of build once in the past, though it didn't go 
too well. I still don't fully understand everything that's done in HLFS, 
havn't sat down to disect it yet. Post some of the errors you're getting 
into this thread, someone may be able to help out.

_______________________________________________
Clfs-support mailing list
Clfs-support@lists.cross-lfs.org
http://lists.cross-lfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfs-support

Reply via email to