Thank you Andrew. Those were the other options I selected. My confusion arose from thinking that the core's version was indicated by the number after ARM! Thanks a lot again. Claudio On Apr 22, 2011 1:05 PM, "Andrew Bradford" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Andrew Bradford <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:42 PM, boedosoy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1) AT91RM9200 (ARM920) >> >> ARM920 is armv4t >> >>> 2) i.MX28 (ARM926) >> >> i.MX28 is a ARM926EJ-S core, which is armv5te > > Sorry, upon review, I may not have completely answered your question. > > For both processors, I'd recommend little endian, arm mode, and the > EABI (aapcs-linux). > > armv4t most likely does not have hard floating point built in. I'd > recommend using soft floating point. > armv5te may have a hard floating point unit, but I'm not that familiar > with Freescale's parts. I believe hard floating point was an option > for armv5 cores. You're safe doing a soft floating point build but if > you can find out from Freescale documentation if they included hard > floating point, use which ever version they have. > > Pick your target triplets to be based on your other choices. Use the > examples in the book as a reference, the examples are definitely not a > complete list of all available options. > > -Andrew > _______________________________________________ > Clfs-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-support-cross-lfs.org
_______________________________________________ Clfs-support mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cross-lfs.org/listinfo.cgi/clfs-support-cross-lfs.org
