Hi, Yes, I'm using 1.5. I'm downloading the CVS files as I type, to see if those work better. I guess I should specify a little more precisely. I'm compiling on a Broadcom BCM1250 (a dual-core system based on the SB1, which is a processor based on version 0.95 of the 64bit MIPS specification).
This is a notoriously evil platform, so it is hard to determine which problems lie in the Click code and which lie in a CPU that surely must constitute cruel and unusual punishment toards programmers. I am also going to do some tests to see if it is a problem in the options I selected, so I can give a more useful report on what the problem is, now that it's clear that 64-bit platforms are working. Jonathan --- Bart Braem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 15 June 2006 01:28, Jonathan Day wrote: > > Does anyone have a set of patches to make Click > 64-bit > > clean? If not, does anyone have any suggestions on > how > > I could fix the type length issues without > breaking > > any of the requirements of Click? > > Are you sure you are using the latest version of > Click (at least 1.5 or even > better CVS)? There have been reports on this list of > Click running on 64 bit > and there are certainly fixes in the Click source... > > Bart > -- > Bart Braem > PATS research group > Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Sciences > University of Antwerp > G2.36, Building G > Middelheimlaan 1 > 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium > Phone: +32 (0)3 265.35.19. > Fax: +32 (0)3 265.37.77. > Web: www.pats.ua.ac.be > > _______________________________________________ > click mailing list > [email protected] > https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ click mailing list [email protected] https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
