Hey Adam, No Authentication. That is more work for me. Thus, git!
Eddie Adam Greenhalgh wrote: > Eddie, > > I'd suggest picking something like subversion and letting users create > there own branches, the wiki password you are using could be used as > authentication. > > Just my 2c. > > As Beyers' says thanks again for click. > > Adam > > On 7/5/07, Beyers Cronje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm happy either way. The public branches sound like a good idea. I heard >> git can get quite complex, so I hope I would not have to read a "Do you >> first commit with git in 21 days" book just to get started :) >> >> Thanks again for Click. >> >> Beyers >> >> On 7/5/07, Eddie Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to move away from Click's current anonymous CVS based >>> development model to a distributed source control system. This would >>> let people maintain public branches of their own. I am leaning towards >>> "git", the tool originally developed for Linux. >>> >>> http://git.or.cz/ >>> >>> Any complaints or comments? Speak now! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Eddie >>> _______________________________________________ >>> click mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> click mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click >> > _______________________________________________ > click mailing list > [email protected] > https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click _______________________________________________ click mailing list [email protected] https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
