The reason why I used strcmp was, that your version with the == operator caused compile-errors. I don't know, what exactly the problem was, because I modified this lines about one year ago ;) Maybe there's a little bit time in the next days, so I can try your version again to find out more.
Best regards, Marco. Bart Braem schrieb: > On Tuesday 16 October 2007 13:08:07 Marco Wenzel wrote: >> Found some comments and chatter-instructions, which are not necessary and >> don't manipulate the functionality. Maybe you should add the updated patch, >> which is attached, to the package. >> btw: I didn't update the ns-elements, because I only needet aodv in >> userlevel. > > Normally the ns code should work fine, but I'm not completely sure. > A question regarding your patch: why did you replace string comparison using > the == operator with a strcmp? Do you think it would make a large difference? > I'm absolutely not sure, so I'm just interested. It's always a good day to > learn more :-) The rest of the patch seems very good, thanks! I've put it > online at our software page. > > Regards, > Bart _______________________________________________ click mailing list [email protected] https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
