Awesome. Thank you so much! On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 17:42, Eddie Kohler wrote:
> Hi Robert, > > All Queue elements in current git should have the optional second output! > > Eddie > > > Robert Ross wrote: > > I've made an attempt at updating all the queue elements to output drops > > on a secondary push port. This seemed to work in userlevel, but caused > > immediate kernel panics when running as a linuxmodule. I'm still very > > new to Click development. Is this something you can add easily? Seems > > to me being able to "trap" dropped packets would be a very useful > > feature. In our particular situation, we want to send these packets to > > a PCAP dump file for further analysis. > > > > Robert Ross > > DSCI Inc. > > Office: 732.542.3113 x173 > > Home: 609.702.8114 > > Cell: 609.509.5139 > > Fax: 253.550.6198 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eddie Kohler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 6:29 PM > > To: Robert Ross > > Cc: click@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu > > Subject: Re: [Click] Queue drops > > > > There isn't a specific reason. Would it be useful for you? > > > > Eddie > > > > > > Robert Ross wrote: > >> Just out of curiosity, is there a specific reason why queue elements > > do not have a secondary push output for dropped packets? Most other > > elements that drop packets will push them out a secondary port if > > available. > >> > >> Robert A. Ross > >> DSCI Inc. > >> 609-509-5139 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> click mailing list > >> click@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu > >> https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click _______________________________________________ click mailing list click@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
