--- Eddie Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hi Giovanni,
>
> First off, I've changed Click to not check for
> click-buildtool unless
> something really needs to be compiled. The previous
> code required buildtool
> even if nothing needed to be compiled.
>
ok!
> To see if your configuration was really using the
> devirtualized elements, try
> something like
>
> click CLICKFILE -h flatconfig -q
>
This is the output of the output ot that command:
forwarder :: FCCAForwarder@@forwarder(IP
192.168.3.100,TIMER 60, FLOODER flooder, DEBUG no,
GESLINKS geslinks, NUM_PACKETS 5);
flooder :: FCCAFlooder(DEBUG no, GESLINKS geslinks);
fccaCheckHeader ::
FCCACheckHeader@@fccaCheckHeader(CHECKSUM false, DEBUG
no);
fccaencap :: FCCAEncap2@@fccaencap(MHC_COEFF 230,
FLOODER flooder);
stripHeader :: FCCAStripHeaderKer@@stripHeader;
geslinks :: FCCAGesLinks(ath0 00:80:48:41:4F:4C, ath1
00:80:48:41:4F:74);
host/toHost :: ToHost(fcca);
host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: FromHost@@host/[EMAIL PROTECTED](fcca,
192.168.3.100/255.255.255.0, ETHER 22:22:22:22:22:22);
host/fromhost_cl ::
Classifier@@host/fromhost_cl(12/0806, 12/0800);
host/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::
FCCAArpResponder@@host/[EMAIL PROTECTED](0.0.0.0/0
1:1:1:1:1:1);
ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: WifiEncap@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](0,
11:11:11:11:11:11 );
ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Queue(10);
ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: ToDevice@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](ath0);
ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::
FromDevice@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](ath0);
ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Paint@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](0);
ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: FilterTX@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED];
ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: WifiDecap@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED];
ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::
HostEtherFilter@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](00:80:48:41:4F:4C,
DROP_OTHER true, DROP_OWN false);
ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: WifiEncap@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](0,
11:11:11:11:11:11 );
ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Queue(10);
ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: ToDevice@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](ath1);
ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::
FromDevice@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](ath1);
ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Paint@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](1);
ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: FilterTX@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED];
ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: WifiDecap@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED];
ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::
HostEtherFilter@@ath0/[EMAIL PROTECTED](00:80:48:41:4F:74,
DROP_OTHER true, DROP_OWN false);
forwarder [2] -> ath1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems that I'm using devirtualized elements, am I
correct?
>
> It's been a long time since anyone has TESTED the
> performance of devirtualized
> code. I wouldn't be surprised if the
> devirtualization transformation wasn't
> very important on embedded systems.
>
In fact the first tests I've done show the same
performace in both cases (and the proc usage is near
100%). Any hints?
Click kernel module, without devirtualization, has a
little better performaces, and the cpu is idle most of
the time (in this case I don't understand why the
processor is idle and throughput is low).
Inviato da Yahoo! Mail.
La web mail più usata al mondo.
http://it.docs.yahoo.com/mail/overview/index.html
_______________________________________________
click mailing list
[email protected]
https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
