A 64bit atomic_couter_t would be great from my point of view. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:26 AM, rchertov <[email protected]> wrote:
> So at some point Eddie introduced counter_t type, which is either 32bit > or 64 bit depending on the machine architecture. However, > AverageCounter still uses atomic_uint32_t. On a 10GE network, byte_rate > wraps around quite rapidly, so a 64bit value would be useful. I suppose > one approach would be create atomic_counter_t which is either 32 or 64 > bit, or the alternate approach would be to use counter_t along with a > lock. Eddie which version would you prefer? > > Roman > _______________________________________________ > click mailing list > [email protected] > https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click > _______________________________________________ click mailing list [email protected] https://amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/click
