On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:19:16 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Probably it will be better to use descriptive name for the test rather than > bugid. In the majority of cases, the test name is not detailed enough, however, it usually gives a better idea than a plain bugid. If a test fails, you still have to analyse it. > Probably it was done to maintain consistency with closed test but since it is > supposedly a rewrite and we have done away with bugid in testname, a > descriptive name will be better. Also @bug tag will let us know for which it > was written.. Even if it's completely re-written, it's not a new test. I'd rather keep the original name: searching for it returns some bugs; if the test name is changed, those search results are lost. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5660
