On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 03:49:04 GMT, Phil Race <p...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Regardless, there's value in the test updates, although my existing comments > on the specifics there still stand. Should I pursue with the test updates with this PR as it seems it can be addressed by product change? I am not sure what specifics needs to be addressed...Are the below ones the one? > And is an offset of 10 enough ? Its a bit arbitrary and cursors could be a > larger shape or different orientation SInce I am going in opposite direction of cursor by using (-10,-10) I guess it should be ok since normally cursor as shown in the screencapture, even if enlarged, willnot encroach on (-10, -10) area unless it's a inverted cursor wihch I am not sure exist or not. > Shouldn't this use TESTCLASSES or something like that ? We have used the same way of ImageIO.write() in jtreg tests ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6140
