On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:15:56 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> But do we actually need the GC where the component is located, or do we need > a GC where the a11y frame should be placed? I am not sure that both are > always the same. Note that you can find the screen where the "virtual > coordinates are located" and then convert them to the device space. Well, in `AccessBridge.getAccessibleContextAt_1(int x, int y, AccessibleContext parent)` we expect [x, y] within the parent bounds and so we can assume [x, y] has the same scaling. However, `AccessBridge.getAccessibleContextAt_2` works with generic [x, y] and there we have to perform generic transformation, indeed... Ok, if we can't avoid it, then I'm ok with the latest version (taking into account my inline comments). Thanks! ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk18/pull/72
