On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:32:39 GMT, Maxim Kartashev <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:

> The two tests `ScreenCaptureGtkTest.java` and 
> `HiDPIRobotScreenCaptureTest.java` under `java/awt/Robot/HiDPIScreenCapture` 
> started to intermittently fail under Windows and Linux after the [recent 
> changes](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/cc7cf81256ed4d74493472017b1c4df20fa2208a)
>  made exclusively for the Linux `Robot` implementation.
> 
> `HiDPIRobotScreenCaptureTest.java`
> Since the Windows failures cannot possibly have their origin in the fix made 
> - the latter being Linux-only - the test apparently either exposes an 
> existing bug in the Windows `Robot` or is bumping against a peculiarity of 
> that platform. The test is reverted back to its original form that didn't 
> fail.
> 
> `ScreenCaptureGtkTest.java`
> The coordinates in the log `(83, 78)` of a failure are higher up than the 
> test suggests `(83, 97)`. I've seen similar failures on Ubuntu 20.04 when the 
> coordinates were set to `(0, 0)`. The color then picked matched the color of 
> the bar drawn at the top of the screen. I believe it's best to place the test 
> pixels towards the center of the window to avoid desktop elements 
> interference.
> 
> The other possible reason for intermittent failures are window coordinates. 
> Suppose that the test is executing with `sun.java2d.uiScale` set to 2. This 
> effectively means that it can only pick colors of pixels at even coordinates 
> (in the absolute desktop space). So if the window is placed at, say, `(201, 
> 201)`, `Robot` can only pick the color at either `(200, 200)` or `(202, 
> 202)`. Since the test only makes sense if it is pixel-accurate, I removed all 
> `@run`s with `sun.java2d.uiScale` other than 1. This way window placement 
> will not cause a failure.
> 
> This was tested on Ubuntu 20.04 and 18.04 with desktop scaling set to 100%, 
> 200%, and 300%.

I submitted a job for testing the changes.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7613

Reply via email to